Umune
Junior Member
Fortasse morias, fruar.
Posts: 98
|
Post by Umune on Oct 20, 2011 21:51:10 GMT -5
30% Approval, because I do like hypercubes 30% Sarcasm, because it is spinning to make it look more complex 30% Scorn, because you are copying me
oh, and 10% meta
|
|
|
Post by Ozzatron on Oct 21, 2011 5:28:18 GMT -5
That's too equal of proportions to have me believe you. Also, they're different enough that it doesn't matter to me.
|
|
|
Post by scud47 on Oct 21, 2011 5:32:39 GMT -5
Aperture Science beats all hypercubes and whatnot.
|
|
|
Post by Ozzatron on Oct 21, 2011 5:47:19 GMT -5
Not really. Switch it to one of The Fall's Aperture logos and then it will prove you're a real nerd.
|
|
csssuf
Full Member
The tubes are busy, try again later.
Posts: 231
|
Post by csssuf on Oct 21, 2011 14:47:12 GMT -5
Would a hypercube activate an Aperture Science Heavy-Duty 300-Megawatt Super-colliding Super-button?
|
|
|
Post by scud47 on Oct 21, 2011 15:51:57 GMT -5
No, because that doesn't exist. It's 1500 MW.
|
|
|
Post by Ozzatron on Oct 21, 2011 16:02:27 GMT -5
Hypercubes have volume like cubes have surface area. So they can activate the button with force from moving due to gravity because they have mass.
|
|
|
Post by Headhunter09 on Oct 21, 2011 20:43:58 GMT -5
FOUR dimensional hypercubes have volume like cubes have surface area.
|
|
|
Post by purelamb on Oct 21, 2011 20:58:46 GMT -5
The emergents weren't around 13 years ago.(edit) wrong bio FUUUU
|
|
|
Post by Ozzatron on Oct 21, 2011 21:34:35 GMT -5
Glad to see the modify button get some use.
There's a delete button too.
::edit:: @matt: I meant specifically a tesseract, which is what I have in my avatar.
|
|